6 comments

  • Isamu 58 minutes ago
    >Broadcom will produce advanced radio frequency components — including FBAR filters

    Thin-film bulk acoustic resonator

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin-film_bulk_acoustic_resona...

    >Trends to utilize RF spectrum more efficiently with higher frequencies than roughly 1.5–2.5 GHz and in some cases also simultaneously with increasing RF output power have supported FBAR technology to become one of the key enabling technologies in telecommunication realisations. FBAR technology complements and in some cases competes with surface acoustic wave (SAW) technology and FBAR resonators can replace crystals in crystal oscillators and crystal filters at frequencies more than 100 MHz.

    • MrBuddyCasino 28 minutes ago
      Fascinating. I suppose they can be smaller than quartz crystals?
      • drum55 21 minutes ago
        Very little uses crystal oscillators, they’re gigantic compared with electronics today and have very wonky performance over temperature and shock.
  • inigyou 36 minutes ago
    When did we start using the wording "increase spend"?
    • mpalmer 32 minutes ago
      Marketing departments everywhere have been letting internal corpspeak just leak out lately. OAI's announcement shutting down Sora was similar:

      > To everyone who created with Sora, shared it, and built community around it: thank you

      "built community"?

      • tensegrist 18 minutes ago
        "created with", à la "built with"
  • ruperthair 1 hour ago
    As much as I hate the source of the tariff policies, from an uneducated outsider PoV, they do seem to be causing fewer dollars to leave the country in imports.

    How does it feel from an insider perspective? Are the increased costs on imported items and dependent services worth it for a bit more local investment?

    • joshstrange 32 minutes ago
      No company can plan based on the tariffs. There is zero guarantee that then next government won't revoked them or that the current one won't flip-flop. Local manufacturing doesn't swing on a 2-4 (or 6 or 8) year timescale. There needs to be consistency.

      The company that moves (or starts) manufacturing here today might get run out of business when/if tariffs are repealed and their competitor already has production lines in other countries ready to go. Heck, the factory might not even open before the winds shift.

      No one can accurately plan with the uncertainty.

      All the big names like Apple are just paying lip service to this. They are throwing, quite literally, pocket change or funds from the government (like CHIPS, which was less ham-fisted than the tariffs IMHO but still not something that's going to change the landscape overnight) at these endeavours to appease the current admin in favor of reduced/removed tariffs on _their_ products and good PR.

      If congress wanted to actually do their jobs instead of both them and the judiciary abdicating their responsibility to the executive branch then _maybe_ we'd have a chance in hell. Until then you can look forward to more flip-flopping as the government changes and the smaller companies continuing to be ground under the heel of large corporations who can weather (or bribe) their way out of the tariffs.

    • AbrahamParangi 15 minutes ago
      The tariffs have been highly destructive to local manufacturing because in the US we mostly build complex things made out of simpler parts which we import. The cost of everything we build simply increased and as a result many businesses selling relatively higher margin, higher complexity products had to scale back or shut down.

      More to the point, the notion that dollars leaving the country is a real problem is really a kind of primitive understanding of money. Dollars are something we control. If dollars leave the country, that means there is demand for dollars. We control the supply of dollars. We literally can’t lose, so long as people are still using the USD, which they’re less inclined to when we’re tariffing their exports.

    • sanderjd 1 minute ago
      The big problem with the tariff policy is not the cost, it's the corruption. A single person should not have the power to dictate the terms of trade, because the rational play in such a system is for businesses that rely on trade to pander to that person, and that's corrupt.
    • deeg 20 minutes ago
      The tariffs haven't made any difference in the trade deficit. There was a large peak just before the tariffs went into effect but since then the deficit has been largely the same as it was before the tariffs.

      https://www.bea.gov/news/2026/us-international-trade-goods-a...

    • hilariously 57 minutes ago
      It's adding a huge amount of economic turmoil, businesses are not investing because there's no certainty, and there's no more "local investment" except in newspaper articles.
    • riddlemethat 43 minutes ago
      If it had been done with coordinated investment/lending from the government to spur domestic production it’d be a very good move. The economy is stalling (outside of tech) because there is no money for increased production domestically.
    • spamizbad 43 minutes ago
      This is more about the CHIPS act than the tariffs.
      • spiderfarmer 30 minutes ago
        If Trump sat on his hands for four years, he'd have been the best President ever.
        • dboreham 25 minutes ago
          More usually expressed as "if he only played golf".
    • pjc50 18 minutes ago
      > they do seem to be causing fewer dollars to leave the country in imports

      Have you accounted for the dollars that are no longer re-entering the country due to boycotts or retaliatory trade policies?

    • close04 44 minutes ago
      > causing fewer dollars to leave the country

      Might cause fewer dollars to enter the country too. Closed doors block both directions. Other countries are watching and responding in kind. Maybe not that much at first out of fear of retaliation but builds up momentum.

    • spiderfarmer 32 minutes ago
      Please provide sources for your feelings, as the facts all seem to indicate that the deficit is rising. As well as inflation. And the national debt.

      https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/balance-of-trade

      None of his promises ever come to fruition. Stop hoping.

      • ruperthair 14 minutes ago
        It's just from articles like this and what I read on the DIY solar forums, so it's interesting to see the real numbers, thanks.
  • tiffanyh 43 minutes ago
    Could this simply be to provide chips for the products that still haven’t transitioned yet over to Apples in-house C chip.

    Like: Apple Watch, most models of iPads, Pro model of phones, etc.

    Because without this deal, Apple would have had to transition all products by end-of-year.

    • pwarner 28 minutes ago
      This sounds like specialized analog components. Not the modem.
  • khalic 20 minutes ago
    30B investment for "hundreds" of US jobs seems like a weird number to brag about